DISCO tablecloth pattern

Discovery: The DISCO Blog

The Standardization of Ediscovery

Posted by Neil Etheridge on Mar 31, 2017 5:45:00 AM

How should you write ‘ediscovery’?

Is it e-discovery, E-discovery, eDiscovery, or ediscovery? While some may say the derivation of a word should dictate it’s spelling1, others argue that communication has become a fashion; the method, spelling, and even the meaning of language should change to match the current social and cultural climate2. Adobe Spark.jpgThis conversation could lead into serious digression. However, I do think the spelling of a word speaks about the culture and, in some cases, the industry surrounding the term.

Before diving into ediscovery, let’s look at an auxiliary term. In 1978, 14-year-old Shiva Ayyadurai, a medical college employee form New Jersey, “Developed a computer program which replicated the features of the interoffice, inter-organizational paper mail system. He named his program EMAIL.”3 As the commercialization of the internet (and email) exploded, the spelling of email varied widely.4 As email became ubiquitous, the spelling of email was also standardized. Furthermore, we no longer need to explain what email “is”. As the sector has matured, the discussion moved to focus on explaining which email provider gives the best experience, is the most performant, provides the best security, etc.

Email has undoubtedly had a pivotal impact on the process and culture of ediscovery. Similarly, as the commercialization of the internet (and email) exploded, “courts and practitioners struggled, as volumes of information grew at unprecedented rates.”5  Even today, courts continue to debate corresponding issues such as ESI production formats.6

As with email, the spelling of “ediscovery” has varied widely.

DISCO competitors like Everlaw, Kroll Ontrack, and Cicayda use ediscovery on their marketing websites whereas iPRO, Logikcull, Epiq Systems/DTI, and Recommind by OpenText seem to favor eDiscovery. Others such as kCura favor e-discovery whereas Thomson Reuters seems to use a mixture (e-discovery and ediscovery). Still others such as Catalyst use E-Discovery. Prominent law firms Latham & Watkins LLP, DLA Piper, and WilmerHale seem to use the spelling eDiscovery. Other firms, such as Sidley Austin LLP seem to use E-Discovery. DISCO has also used various spellings in the past. However, as the market has matured, a trend by legal practitioners to move towards a simplified spelling - ediscovery - is apparent. One example: Judge Peck’s spelling in his March 2, 2015 Rio Tinto opinion.7

I would argue ediscovery as an industry is now at a maturation point. Taking aEdiscovery solutions to elevate ediscovery lesson from email, the removal of a hyphen should symbolize the reality that 99.99% of discovery is digital. As an industry, let’s recognize that ediscovery is the standard process and instead focus the conversation around understanding which solutions elevate ediscovery from simply moving data around to those that automate and simplify error-prone tasks to allow legal professionals to make high-margin, high-value legal judgments.


Experience everything discovery should be. Try DISCO yourself today!

Take a Self-Guided Demo

 


1 Future Perfect (1993-2017) Is it e-mail, email, E-mail or Email? [Blog Post]. Retrieved from http://www.future-perfect.co.uk/grammar-tip/is-it-e-mail-email-e-mail-or-email.

2 The Email Experience Council (2007). Hyphens Equal Disrespect Petition: countering the counterarguments [Blog Post]. Retrieved from https://emailexperience.org/2007/05/hyphens-equal-disrespect-petition-countering-the-counterarguments.

3 The Inventor of Email (2013-2017). The Inventor of Email is V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai - The Facts [Webpage]. Retrieved from http://www.inventorofemail.com.

4 The Fiction Desk (2008) Retrieved from http://www.thefictiondesk.com/blog/spelling-email-vs-e-mail.

5 Bennett, S. (2015) E-Discovery: We Still Haven’t Found What We’re Looking For {Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/litigation/b/litigation-blog/archive/2015/08/17/e-discovery-we-still-haven-t-found-what-we-re-looking-for.aspx.

6 In re State Farm Lloyds, Relator’s Reply Brief on the Merits, No. 15-0903., 2016 WL 5890375, (Tex. filed Oct. 6, 2016).

7 Rio Tinto PLC v. Vale S.A., 306 F.R.D. 125, 129 (S.D.N.Y. 2015).

Topics: ediscovery, Legal Industry, legal technology